All Writs Act
All Writs Act
There are many parts to this, and none of them are as simple and clear as the government wants to make folks think.
Invoking the All Writs Act is necessary because there is no clear law on this matter, which should be a warning sign in itself.
There are also a number of technical issues involved, about which most folks are ignorant. The general gist of it is that Apple can do what is wanted, but not simply, quickly, or without cost. If it was simple, it would have been done already. Even if Apple brings the magic, it will probably take awhile to brute force the password (days, weeks, months, years, depending). And by cost, I mean, breaking a bunch of proprietary hardware and software stuff irremediably.
There also hasn't been much said about the relative value of the information that could be retrieved, and that also should be a warning sign. What could possibly be on that phone to justify all this?
Nothing, and everything. And if the government finds the level of encryption on an iPhone 5c worrisome, you don't want to know how they feel about the newest phones. Really, you don't.
Apple has made the privacy of its users a high priority for some time now. I'm glad they've taken this stand.
If the government wants to ban encryption, they should try to pass a law about it. Like ITAR did with DH/RSA/PGP. _So_ successful.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/02/how-apple-will-fight-the-doj-in-iphone-backdoor-crypto-case/
There are many parts to this, and none of them are as simple and clear as the government wants to make folks think.
Invoking the All Writs Act is necessary because there is no clear law on this matter, which should be a warning sign in itself.
There are also a number of technical issues involved, about which most folks are ignorant. The general gist of it is that Apple can do what is wanted, but not simply, quickly, or without cost. If it was simple, it would have been done already. Even if Apple brings the magic, it will probably take awhile to brute force the password (days, weeks, months, years, depending). And by cost, I mean, breaking a bunch of proprietary hardware and software stuff irremediably.
There also hasn't been much said about the relative value of the information that could be retrieved, and that also should be a warning sign. What could possibly be on that phone to justify all this?
Nothing, and everything. And if the government finds the level of encryption on an iPhone 5c worrisome, you don't want to know how they feel about the newest phones. Really, you don't.
Apple has made the privacy of its users a high priority for some time now. I'm glad they've taken this stand.
If the government wants to ban encryption, they should try to pass a law about it. Like ITAR did with DH/RSA/PGP. _So_ successful.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/02/how-apple-will-fight-the-doj-in-iphone-backdoor-crypto-case/
Comments
Post a Comment